DESERT ISLAND HANDS: AMIT BADIANI
When I asked Amit to be a guest on Desert Island Hands, he sent me the required information but entitled it Desert Island Regrets! This came as no surprise - Amit is an extremely talented Bridge player, but he sets impossibly high standards for himself.
Amit works at the Bank of England, in the Reserves Management section of the Foreign Exchange Division. In his own words, he describes how he became a Bridge player:
I first played bridge when I was 14. A friend at school (Paul) was reading a James Bond book (‘Moonraker’?) in which 007 outwits the villain at the bridge table. Paul didn’t understand this part, but he knew his grandfather played bridge so went to him for help. His grandfather (Don) told Paul to find three friends and he’d teach them how to play bridge. I wasn’t one of these three, but two of them didn’t take to the game at all and dropped out, so even if Don played they were down to three. I was drafted in to make up the numbers (a bit like my appearances for the County team these days).
We played once a week, every week – lounge bridge rather than kitchen bridge, perhaps. After six months Don decided we ought to enter the local (Harrow) league and the Middlesex Cup (the equivalent of our President’s Cup). We played stone-age Acol (virtually all doubles penalty – so when I play with Sandy I am reverting to something I first learnt years ago!) with attitude signals on partner’s lead, and no signals at all on declarer’s lead. I find it hard to understand how we ever defended a hand correctly but, despite this handicap, we got promoted in the league and reached the semi-final of the knockout - we clearly relied on fluke! Don, who was 67 years old when he taught us, had in his youth played with Doug Smerdon before giving up competitive bridge. As luck would have it, our opponents in the cup semi-final were Waterlow/Smerdon and Oram/Oram. Don hadn’t seen Smerdon for a while and had been telling him how well he thought we were coming along. Imagine his embarrassment when we were well and truly hammered, losing by over 100 imps. Don was mortified and, even if we had only been playing for about a year, I have to say I remember our performance as rather inept. The fourth member of the team, and my partner, was Steve Root.
I think we played in the league for one more year but after that we left school for different sixth-form colleges and stopped playing. So, although I learnt while I was at school, it wasn’t organised by the school.
I hardly played a hand for the next five or six years, until I came to Oxford to attempt an ultimately-doomed DPhil. In my first week, I couldn’t find the room where the bridge club met (probably because I was wandering around Walton St instead of being within the Somerville College walls). I had mentally given myself a limit of 5 more minutes to find it when, owing to the room fortuitously being on the College boundary with Walton St and the back gate being open, I stumbled upon it. Bear in mind my limited experience of duplicate consisted of teams-of-four matches. So joining in with a whole roomful of card players was all new to me and, as I played my first pairs duplicate, I didn’t even know how it was scored. In some sense, then, that was also a first experience of bridge.
(Incidentally, I met Steve Root again a few years ago. He too had stopped playing after we left school only to take it up again many years later. Interestingly, his team won the Middlesex Cup this year…)
True to character, Amit insists that he cannot find any examples of success from the Bridge table. I'll let him describe his favourite disasters in his own words, even though he is far too hard on himself:
No triumphs I’m afraid – trying to remember them would be like looking for a needle in a haystack that didn’t even contain a needle to begin with. Disasters – that’s like trying to find hay in a haystack so I’ll stick to that.
One thing I’ll say as background: I really do realise how hard it can be to play with me. And I won’t even attempt to justify my losses of temper.
I’ve experienced many occasions of saying something awful and regretting it later, but this is by far my most shameful moment. The scene is the teams event at Bournemouth. I am playing with Douglas Watkinson and we have endured a frustrating pairs event in which we have failed to qualify for the Two Stars final. We are defending
6ª as East-West and reach something like the following position:|
|
ª -© x x ¨ Q x x § x x x |
|
|
ª -© Q J ¨ A 10 x x § x x |
|
ª 10 x x© - ¨ x x § K x x |
|
|
ª K Q J© - ¨K J x x §A |
|
Declarer cashes
ªK and, on discovering that spades don’t break, plays on diamonds. When Douglas wins the second diamond (I have learnt count signals by now so he knows I started with two), all I am thinking is ‘Force declarer to ruff, Douglas.’ I can see it so clearly… heart return to force declarer and we defeat it easily. When Douglas plays a third diamond instead, I’ve focussed so much on this other line of defence that my thoughts don’t adapt. I completely ignore the fact that I’m allowed to ruff the diamond, and pitch a club. Declarer, mystified, wins, draws trumps and claims. If that was bad, the worst is yet to come. I still don’t realise how badly I’ve carved the defence and say, ‘All you had to do was force him to ruff. Was that so hard?’, all the time shaking my head in bewilderment. Douglas, who could with some justification punch me very hard and walk off, remains calm and says nothing. I have an uneasy feeling about the hand and, three rounds later as I am sorting my cards, it hits me.‘I could have ruffed the diamond?’
Douglas nods, but says nothing.
In that moment, my partner showed all the grace I so singularly lack. For his understated reaction, he has my utmost admiration and respect. If I were to butcher a stone-cold, 13-on-top 7NT in the Gold Cup final (chance would be a fine thing) I don’t think it could be as bad a moment as the one I have just described – unless, that is, as usual I blame my partner instead of myself.
Somehow, Douglas accepted my apologies and a year or so later, having won the County Pairs, we went to play in the Corwen. Going into the final session we were sixth, although we had led after the first session. We’d had a pretty good set when we came to the final two boards. On the first of these, our opponent had to lead from:
|
ª x x x x x |
|
|
after the auction
1§ - 1¨ ; 2§ - 3NT.He chose
©9, which worked spectacularly well when the full hand was something like:|
|
ª A J© K x x ¨ Q x § K Q x x x x |
|
|
ª x x x x x© Q 9 x ¨ A x x § x x |
|
ª x x© A J 10 x ¨ x x x x § J x x |
|
|
ª K Q x x© x x x ¨ K J x x § A x |
|
(Perhaps I should have bid more scientifically and tried
2ª at my second turn.) Going minus on the board didn’t earn many matchpoints.On the final board, at love all, I held:
|
ª A x x x |
and heard:
|
North |
East |
South |
West |
|
Watkinson |
Badiani |
||
|
Pass |
Pass |
||
|
1§ |
1© |
1ª |
Pass |
|
2§ |
2© |
2NT |
? |
I made the dubious decision to double. This was redoubled on my left and passed back to me. I made a second stupid call when I passed. To top it off, I found virtually the only lead (
©A) to let 2NT** make. The full hand?|
|
ª x x© x x ¨ A x x § K Q J x x x |
|
|
ª A x x x© A x ¨ Q x x x § x x x |
|
ª K x x© Q J 10 9 8 x ¨ K J x § x |
|
|
ª Q J x x© K x x ¨ x x x §A x x |
|
Not surprisingly, this was a complete zero. Doubling without a club trick was very poor, and I should just bid
3§ (good heart raise) or 3© for an 80% board.We finished third, just over a top behind the winners. I know this doesn’t really make sense when everyone is playing the boards in a different order, but if it hadn’t been for that shocking last round…